Working Together To Safeguard Children

operative together To Safeguard ChildrenFor the get of this assignment I lead focus on the publication on the job(p) together to Safeguard Children (2006) and the usual loving C ar Councils statute of physical exertion for loving C ar Workers (2005) to critically evaluate and explore how they impact upon the power of the amicable ladderer whilst carrying come out initial enquiries.The neighborly take a leak vocation promotes social change, problem solving in gay relationships and the empowerment and shift of people to enhance well being, utilising theories of human demeanour and social systems. friendly crop intervenes at the points where people interact with their environments. Principles of human chastises and social umpire be underlying to social do work (International Association of schools of social work and international Federation of cordial Workers 2001). Social workers act as negotiators amidst the individual service user and the wider society i n set to help oneself the individual with the problems they be facing. This is performed by schoolmasters utilising theories, their own values and beliefs of human behaviour and social systems (International Association of schools of social work and international Federation of Social Workers 2001).Working Together to Safeguard Children (2006) go outs guidance for professionals who are on the job(p) with nestlingren and their families to assists them in their safeguarding practice. This document places emphasis on the motivating for joint working as this provides a variety of knowledge, theory and skill when working with small fryren and their families. The General Social Care Council (GSCC) identified codes of practice that aim to raise the standards in social care services, highlighting the responsibility of social care workers and their employers to jibe that the codes are followed at bottom practice.The General Social Care Council (2005) highlighted that the Codes of enforce were to reflect the breathing good practice of professionals and shared the standards and ethical practice to which they aspired. The main aims of the Code of Practice are to inform services users and the public of the standards that they jackpot forebode from social care workers and to provide social care workers with stimulate lines of accountability, wherefore ensuring that workers are aware of the responsibility upon them to ensure that these conduct do non fall below the standards expected of them as this can lead to the release of workers (GSCC 2002).Social workers are challenged on a daily basis to uphold the Codes of Practice while implementing government policies and procedures and direct the responsibility for limit grueling decisions and recommendations that will ultimately affect and impact upon the lives of electric razorren and their families. It is on that pointfore critical that professionals are able to claim these decisions by drawing and ref lecting upon guidance to enable professionals to instal ethical and sound decisions in the best interest of the kidskin and their family. Social workers harbour to accept and be accountable for all their actions and need to be able to explain why they have acted in a sure way. Therefore social workers need to have a good cause of how nature and society affects the way in which they practice enabling them to work competently and efficiently.Social workers strive to ensure that children are protected from maltreat as best they can and in order to do so social workers are trained and led by policies and procedures set out non only by the government but also from within the employing representation. The law also forms an essential part in the decision making process to ensure that children are not subject to significant harm.Professionals have a tariff to investigate and complete initial enquiries under incision 47 of the Children figure 1989, if there is reasonable cause to suspect that a child whom is living or found within the local theater of operations is believed to be suffering, or is likely to suffer significant harm (HM regime 2006). The Children Act 1989 introduced Significant Harm as the threshold that justifies compulsory intervention and determines if a child is made subject to a shield figure or provided with support in the children and families arena (OLoughlin OLoughlin 2008) therefore a child may be supported on a child in need basis.The process will begin at the referral stage which is the head start point of contact when information and or concerns are brought to the attention of Childrens Services, this can include a baptistry that is already open to the associated local authority if there are an accumulation of concerns or a pre birth esteemment indicates significant harm to an unborn child (DOH 2006). A team theatre director and a lead social worker will be allocated to the case and a decision will be made as to whether or not there are concerns which could pose potential or literal harm to the child, if this is so then a decision will be made to proceed to a strategy run into and will be recorded at this point by management.A strategy meeting should involve Childrens services, Police, Education, Health and each other relevant agencies who are working with the family. Working in alliance with all professionals involved is essential as sharing information helps to build a clear picture of the child, family social unit and the issues causing concern, thus promoting the safety and well being of the child (Children Act 1989). merely in some instances this sharing of information is done without the assume of the parents which immediately interlockings with the code of practice set out by the General Social Care Council (2005) as it states that the rights and interests of the service user essential be protected, respecting and maintaining the dignity and privacy of the service user. Already there is a contradiction starting amid the Working Together to Safeguard Children guidance and the Codes of Practice. some other conflict emerges if the outcome of the strategy is to proceed with a partition 47 enquiry, due to Working Together to Safeguard Children (2006) stating that Parents and those with parental responsibility are informed of concerns at the earliest prospect, unless to do so would place the child at insecurity of significant harm, or undermine a vicious investigation and that as parental consent has not been obtained any work done should be exercise in a manner which allows for coming(prenominal) working relationships with the family.This sounds plausible and is aimed to be in the best interests of the child advertise it conflicts with the Codes of Practice (2005) which state that a social care worker must strive to establish and maintain the trust and confidence of service users. As a social worker it is incredibly difficult to uphold the Codes of Practic e whilst following the guidance of Working Together to Safeguard Children, due to not being able to be as open and honest during the initial contact as possible. The rationale for this is that the only information to be provided to the family is that, that is concur within the strategy meeting (HM Government 2006).Whilst carrying out a Section 47 enquiry it is essential that the child in question is utter to alone as this gives the child the opportunity to express their wishes and feelings and allows professionals to gather further information. If the child is not spoken to alone it reduces the ability to prehendly assess the needs and put on the lines surrounding the child. When speaking to the child it is imperative that discussions are practiced in a way that minimises distress but maximises the likelihood that they will provide accurate and complete information as gaining the childs views can be critical in the prevention of significant harm (HM Government 2006). distinctly stating that professionals are able to speak to children without the consent of parents or anyone with parental responsibility, if there is evidence that the child would be placed at further risk should the parents be informed.Consequently social workers are following the guidance from Working Together to Safeguard Children yet disregarding the Codes of Practice which places a duty on the social worker to communicate in an appropriate, open, accurate and unequivocal way (GSCC 2005).Section 47 enquiries may include a medical examination and failure to consent from the parents or failure to allow the child to be seen in general may result in the professionals having to make an application to the Court in respect of being granted appropriate orders such as an Emergency Protection Order or opinion Order, professionals will be directed by legal professionals in this instant. once again there are conflicts within this, in respect of the Codes of Practice, by attending Court and seeking an order, families may feel that they are not being listened to or their wishes respected, in some scenarios it may be matte by services users that their privacy and dignity is not being respected. How eer there is one Code of Practice that has some similarities to Working Together to Safeguard Children taking necessary stairs to minimise the risks of service users from doing genuine or potential harm to themselves or others (GSCC 2005).It may also receive evident when completing a Section 47 enquiry that the child in question and siblings if any, may need to be accommodated whilst subsequent assessment are complete. The local authority will whenever possible attempt to ensure that the child can remain at home and appropriate steps will be taken to ensure the childs safety, however there are times when the risk is such that there is no other option than to remove the child from the family home (HM Government 2006). There is a clear contrast to the Codes of Practice as they sta te that service users have the right to take risks hence placing professionals in a position whereby they need to make decisions as to whether the risks can be managed without leaving the child at risk of further harm.As a social worker you are set about with conflict and dilemmas when attempting to work in accordance with both Working Together to Safeguard Children and the Codes of Practice. This leads to dilemmas in practice that require consideration and in order for social workers to make sound and professional judgements it is essential that social workers have regular supervision to aid their practice, allow them to reflect on decisions made, look for at various interventions and possible outcomes. Supervision allows for social workers to ensure that they provide effective and efficient work with children and families.Working within child protection is complex and the need to share information is vital therefore any decisions that are made with regards to children should be done so in a multi-agency manner. This aims to ensure that professionals are not individually held accountable for failure to work in accordance with the Codes of Practice and government guidance while incorporating inter-agency working, which is fundamental when combating child abuse (Working Together to Safeguard Children 2006).The Codes of Practice (2005) express the need for social worker to be accountable for their own work, this includes the need for social workers to recognise and respect the roles and expertise of other professionals and work in partnership with them. Joint supervision with professionals in a similar field gives the opportunity to share knowledge and skill an may cover something the fellow professional has failed to notice therefore providing and even best quality of service to the public.It has mother abundantly clear throughout this assignment that social work is ever changing and that the decision making process, individually or jointly between professio nals is never easy, especially when it involves the lives of children and young people. Adhering to The Codes of Practice whilst also adhering to government guidance, simply, causes conflict in practice this is something that may never change and as a social worker it is imperative to note this and whilst following policies and procedures we must not forget that the children we are trying to protect and the families that they belong to are people, human beings with feelings, rights and deserve to be treated correctly.